Kanji Shiro

★★★★★ About case size
Date posted : Wednesday, Oct 23 2019


Translated by Google About case size
The case diameter is 39mm, but this is the size including the crown. 36mm excluding crown. I think that it is a practical watch though the sense of quality is not good.

Original Japanese review
ケースサイズについて
ケース径に39mmとありますが、これはリューズを含んだサイズです。リューズを除くと36mmです。高級感はいまいちですが実用的な時計だと思います。

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---

Shouta Zuko

★★★★★ clock
Date posted : Saturday, Oct 19 2019


Translated by Google clock
Light and beautiful because it is made of titanium. The time is also accurate in seconds.

Original Japanese review
時計
チタン製のため軽く、綺麗です。時間も秒単位で正確です。

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---

Hayato Fazekas

★★★★★ Time is accurate !!
Date posted : Monday, Oct 14 2019


Translated by Google Time is accurate !!
As expected, it is solar, so unlike automatic winding it is not bothersome !!

Original Japanese review
時間正確じゃ!!
期待通りの正確さ、ソーラーなので、自動巻と違って面倒くさくない!!

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---

Yusuke Zuko

★★★★★ Successor (additional comments after a year and a half)
Date posted : Tuesday, Sep 17 2019


Translated by Google Successor (additional comments after a year and a half)
I bought a solar radio watch from SEIKO when I got a job, but it was just the 10th anniversary of my job, and even stainless steel made rust, such as a groove in the back cover, so I bought this made of titanium that resists rust. It was. There is no opportunity to go to America or China where there is radio waves other than Japan, but I am very satisfied with the calm design and lightness of titanium. However, for those who have never purchased a titanium watch so far, it is very light, so if you like the feeling of wearing a watch, you should try wearing it at an electrical shop.・ I use it for a year and a half, and it has a high performance at all times compared to Casio's cheap (a product of around 10,000 yen). Sometimes I work in the dark at night, but when I was using a Casio cheap guy, if I do not charge it with chitin during the day, the watch will suddenly stop and panic lightly There was also, but there is no worry about this product here. However, since the dial is not phosphorescent, it is not suitable for night work (lol) In the first place it seems that it is a slightly high practical clock for mid-level businessmen, not a clock equipped by people who work in darkness in the first place I'm not sure about that. As for rust, there is no problem at present, but small scratches are easy to be noticed compared to the stainless steel model. Although it is strong, white lines and small scratches are much more noticeable than stainless steel Seiko. In fact, I am not a businessman, so I often hit it, but I think that it is necessary to select stainless steel or titanium, taking that side into consideration. However, if you are afraid of bumping, you can't buy a very expensive watch, and even if you buy it, it will become a fertilizer for chiffons.

Original Japanese review
後継（1年半使用しての感想追記）
就職した時にSEIKOのソーラー電波時計を買いましたが、ちょうど就職10周年ということと流石にステンレススチールでも裏蓋の溝等の錆が激しくなってきてしまったため錆に強いチタン製のこちらを買いました。日本以外に電波のあるアメリカや中国へ行く機会は正直まったくないですが落ち着いたデザインとチタンの軽さに大満足です。ただこれまでチタン時計を購入したことがない方に関しては非常に軽いため、時計を装着している感じが好きだという方に関しては一度電気屋さんなどで装着してみるとよいかと思います。・1年半使用してみてバッテリーの持ちに関してはカシオの安い（1万円前後の商品）よりは全然高性能です。夜間に暗闇の中で作業したりすることもあるのですが、カシオの安いやつを使っていた際は日中キチンと充電しておかないと急に時計が停止してしまい軽めにパニックになることもありましたが、こちらの商品はそっち系の心配は全くありません。ただ、文字盤が蓄光ではないので夜間業務には向きません(笑)そもそも論で真っ暗闇で仕事する人が装備する時計ではなく中堅ビジネスマン向けのちょっと高い実用時計なんだろうとも思えますがその辺はよくわかりません。錆びに関しては今のところまったく問題ありませんが、ステンレス製のモデルと比べて小さい傷が地味に気になりやすいです。頑丈さは強いのですが以前しようしていたステンレス製のセイコーよりも白い線や小さい傷が結構目立ちます。実際私はビジネスマンではないので結構ぶつけてしまったりすることも多いのですが、その辺を加味してステンレス製かチタン製を選択する必要があるかと思います。ただ、ぶつけるの怖がってたらこれよりも高級な時計はとてもとても購入できませんし、購入してもタンスの肥やしになってしまいますのでよくよく考えて購入することをオススメいたします。

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---

Shouta Takahashi

★★★★★ Satisfied as expected
Date posted : Sunday, Sep 15 2019


Translated by Google Satisfied as expected
We purchased on the titanium band with on / off combined use, solar radio wave. As expected, it is light and easy to use.

Original Japanese review
予想通りで満足
オンオフ兼用、ソーラー電波でチタンバンドということで購入しました。予想通りで軽くて使いやすく大満足です。

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---

Yushimitsu Okabe

★★★★★ Um
Date posted : Thursday, Aug 29 2019


Translated by Google Um
It is a watch worthy of the price. Although it cannot be compared with Grand Seiko, it is said that the metal belt is not tight enough, or the place where it is connected is worth the price. The face itself is sparkling and beautiful, but it's worth the price. Radio reception seems to be good. It was automatically set at the exact time when the box was opened. There is no madness for a second. It seems to play an active part as a sub clock.

Original Japanese review
う～～ん
値段相応の時計ですね。グランドセイコーとは比較できませんが、金属ベルトの締まりの悪さといいますかクネクネするところなんかは、やはり値段相応という感想です。フェイス本体事態はキラキラしていて綺麗ですが、でも値段相応ですね。電波受信は良いみたいです。箱をあけた瞬間に自動的にですが正確な時刻にセットされました。一秒も狂いありません。サブの時計として活躍してくれそうです。

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---

Yushimitsu Takahashi

★★★★★ SEIKO's reliable watch
Date posted : Thursday, Aug 15 2019


Translated by Google SEIKO's reliable watch
I really like both performance and design. We are satisfied that it is easy to use light thing with titanium case.

Original Japanese review
SEIKOの信頼性の高さを感じる腕時計
性能、デザイン共に大変気に入っています。チタンケースで軽い事も使いやすいく満足しています。

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---

Kazuya Hakiuchi

★★★★★ Light, thin, not crazy
Date posted : Wednesday, Aug 7 2019


Translated by Google Light, thin, not crazy
To be honest, I was not very interested in watches, so I bought them as a business use watch with radio solar. For those who do not know the goodness of the mechanical type, I felt that the light and thin radio solar was more attractive than the clock adjustment and battery replacement. When I looked at the actual product, it was cooler than the photo, and as expected, it was light and thin, and I was very satisfied. I purchased a separate adjustment kit for the band and adjusted it myself, but it was easy.

Original Japanese review
軽い、薄い、狂わない
正直、時計にはあまり興味が無く、電波ソーラーでビジネスユースの時計として購入しました。機械式の良さが分からない身としては、時計合わせ、電池交換不要で、軽くて薄い電波ソーラーの方がよっぽど魅力的に感じました。実際に実物を見てみると、写真よりカッコよく、予想通り軽くて薄くて大満足でした。バンド、別に調節キットを購入し、自分で調節しましたが、簡単に出来ました。

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---